Justin, truth be told, the LP could be the party of swashbuckling freedom fighters, pioneers, artists, tech innovators, billionaire entrepreneurs - instead they run candidates for Governor with zero experience, no money, no website, and that are practically impossible to contact. The good news is that we can change that. I'd be happy to demo how.
I don't understand the "our sake" part of your question. I'm talking about the LP. A political party runs candidates to represent voters - not themselves. So they (the people I mentioned) would be "risking it" for their own sake - to get a better Govt. The question is why do so many rich and powerful people agree with Libertarian values but don't donate to the LP? For example Mark Cuban talks about reading the Fountainhead when he needs inspiration. He should be a Libertarian. Has the LP ever ask themselves why Mark Cuban is not a Libertarian?
Justin, truth be told, the LP could be the party of swashbuckling freedom fighters, pioneers, artists, tech innovators, billionaire entrepreneurs - instead they run candidates for Governor with zero experience, no money, no website, and that are practically impossible to contact. The good news is that we can change that. I'd be happy to demo how.
What do we have to offer those with means and ability to convince them to risk it for our sake?
I don't understand the "our sake" part of your question. I'm talking about the LP. A political party runs candidates to represent voters - not themselves. So they (the people I mentioned) would be "risking it" for their own sake - to get a better Govt. The question is why do so many rich and powerful people agree with Libertarian values but don't donate to the LP? For example Mark Cuban talks about reading the Fountainhead when he needs inspiration. He should be a Libertarian. Has the LP ever ask themselves why Mark Cuban is not a Libertarian?